Previous Entry Share Next Entry
You see, Communist ideology IS strategy.
xyu
In a flash I grasped the brilliance of the whole long range strategy. It is not necessary that a deception be perfect. It is not necessary that the KGB control everything that happens.

What mattered, from first to last, was the character of the capitalist system in America and the West.

This is what Marx and Lenin taught, after all. Communist victories have always depended on the stupidities that attend bourgeois society.

Marx understood these stupidities better than anyone. Such was the real subject of his study.

You see, Communist ideology IS strategy.

Mao understood this when he said that he had a weapon better than the atomic bomb, and that weapon was Marxism-Leninism.

You defeat someone if you study their weaknesses and devise your weapons accordingly.

The West is into consumption, it desires peace, so let them consume and let them dream of peace! Scare them with a few Cold War confrontations and get their hopes up with a spectacular peace offensive.

Even Ronald Reagan couldn't resist. He hugged Gorbachev in Red Square. Do you realize how simple it all is? What mattered was the willingness of every section of society to be fooled by this exact sort of thing.

Tell the West that Communism is dead. Tell them you are running up the white flag. The conservatives would claim victory, and want to believe it. The business men would claim the "peace dividend," and believe it. The consumer would see cheaper goods in the store, and believe it. Everyone would rejoice that the nuclear standoff between East and West would be over, and believe it.

The left would be glad, because people wouldn't be so paranoid of socialst ideals.

People like good news. They cling to it. But still, it was so incredible.
(JRN)

  • 1
You really do not understand Communism. Human being is a political animal by nature. Therefore Communism is a natural evolution of human craving to the group. From the evoutionary perspective individual is much younger comparing to group ("kollektiff"). It's not Marx, who speaks about Communism. It's the eternal tradition, including christian thinkers, buddhists, konfutians and man others, who were dealing with the border between "collective" and "personal". The very time invested in that simple question ("where is the line between personal and collective?") is a sign of deep roots of what is known as Communism today. Anyway, Lucifer is the brightest representative of anti-Communists.

how old r u ? what is your education background? trade? parents?

>You really do not understand Communism.

your claim is based on nothing

>Human being is a political animal by nature.

another air wave

>Therefore Communism is a natural evolution of human craving to the group.
One more empty statement

>From the evoutionary perspective individual is much younger comparing to group ("kollektiff").

same goes for emty statement like this

>It's not Marx, who speaks about Communism.

Aga, marx spoke about fertilizer))))

>It's the eternal tradition, including christian thinkers, buddhists, konfutians and man others, who were dealing with the border between "collective" and "personal".

this misconception lives only in your head

>The very time invested in that simple question ("where is the line between personal and collective?") is a sign of deep roots of what is known as Communism today.

Well, fools are fooled and what is known to them is bullshit. But this statement of yours is just your dream.

>Anyway, Lucifer is the brightest representative of anti-Communists.

You joking, i knew it

кароче Денис, знакомый с люцифером, хуй знает кто это))) или ты начнеш думать или мне станет скучно и я позвоню Свете)

  • 1
?

Log in

No account? Create an account